Review Article  Open Access


Immune Netw. 2020 Oct;20(5):e37. English.
Published online Oct 23, 2020.  https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2020.20.e37
Copyright © 2020. The Korean Association of Immunologists
Host-Pathogen Dialogues in Autophagy, Apoptosis, and Necrosis during Mycobacterial Infection
Jin Kyung Kim,1,2 Prashanta Silwal,1,2 and Eun-Kyeong Jo1,2
1Department of Microbiology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
2Infection Control Convergence Research Center, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Correspondence to Eun-Kyeong Jo. Department of Microbiology and Infection Control Convergence Research Center, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, 266 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea. Email: hayoungj@cnu.ac.kr
Received August 24, 2020; Revised October 15, 2020; Accepted October 15, 2020.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.




Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is an etiologic pathogen of human tuberculosis (TB), a serious infectious disease with high morbidity and mortality. In addition, the threat of drug resistance in anti-TB therapy is of global concern. Despite this, it remains urgent to research for understanding the molecular nature of dynamic interactions between host and pathogens during TB infection. While Mtb evasion from phagolysosomal acidification is a well-known virulence mechanism, the molecular events to promote intracellular parasitism remains elusive. To combat intracellular Mtb infection, several defensive processes, including autophagy and apoptosis, are activated. In addition, Mtb-ingested phagocytes trigger inflammation, and undergo necrotic cell death, potentially harmful responses in case of uncontrolled pathological condition. In this review, we focus on Mtb evasion from phagosomal acidification, and Mtb interaction with host autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis. Elucidation of the molecular dialogue will shed light on Mtb pathogenesis, host defense, and development of new paradigms of therapeutics.

Keywords:
Tuberculosis; Host-pathogen interactions; Autophagy; Apoptosis; Necrosis
INTRODUCTION

There is a need for new therapeutics for tuberculosis (TB), the leading cause of death by a single infectious agent worldwide. Although much effort has been focused on controlling TB, multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant TB threaten human health globally. In addition, approximately 25% of people are estimated to have latent TB, and so are at risk of active TB (World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Report 2018).

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the major pathogen of human TB and can escape from host immunity and phagolysosomal fusion, surviving in phagosomes (1). Mtb cell-wall lipid components are coordinately expressed during different stages of infection (2). Mtb infection triggers intracellular signaling pathways, enhancing the inflammatory cytokine/chemokine responses that are crucial for controlling Mtb replication and the immunopathologic response (3). The host-Mtb interaction alters the host immune response and triggers cell death (4, 5). The virulence factors of Mtb manipulate host immune, inflammatory, and cell death responses to facilitate intracellular growth (4).

Host protective immunity involves the control of inflammation and cell death, as well as the induction of antimicrobial factors (6). Autophagy is a cell-autonomous defense mechanism against a variety of stresses, including intracellular pathogens (7, 8). Xenophagy is activated to target cytosolic Mtb for lysosomal delivery and degradation (9). However, Mtb evades xenophagy and LC3-associated phagocytosis via its virulence effectors and by modulating host factors (10). Mtb and its components regulate host cell death—i.e., apoptosis and necrosis, during infection (11, 12). Generally, apoptosis is beneficial, whereas necrosis is detrimental, depending on the context. Mtb causes cell death by apoptosis and necrosis, contributing to the outcomes of infection.

This review provides insight into how Mtb manipulates host-cell autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis. An appreciation of the host-Mtb interaction will enable the development of novel therapeutics and identification of the factors implicated in progression to active TB.

HOST REACTION TO Mtb INFECTION

Mtb is an obligate aerobic mycobacterium with a unique cell-wall structure and is capable of surviving within an immunocompetent host (13). As a primarily airborne disease, TB is transmitted person-to-person by aerosolized droplets containing Mtb (13, 14). Mtb travels through the respiratory tract to the alveoli, where it is phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells (14, 15). Once phagocytosed, Mtb replicates within the macrophages, resulting in a robust inflammatory response followed by T-cell activation and recruitment of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes from neighboring blood vessels, forming granulomatous lesions (14, 16, 17). In this environment, macrophages differentiate into foamy macrophages filled with lipid droplets, multinucleate giant cells, and epithelial macrophages. Over time, the granuloma acquires a more organized structure with the formation of a fibrous sheath of extracellular matrix (17). Although most granulomas comprise a balance between Mtb and host-derived immune cells, under certain conditions, these structures progress into a more pathologic state characterized by diminished vascularization, increased necrosis, proliferation of foamy macrophages, and accumulation of caseous and hypoxic portions in the center (17). Rupture of these granulomas releases infectious bacilli into the airway (17, 18). Our understanding of the granulomatous response to mycobacteria is in its infancy, and the mechanisms underlying the formation of protective and destructive granulomas are unclear.

The cell wall of Mtb is composed primarily of mycolic acids, which contribute to its acid resistance, along with smaller proportions of other lipids, including mannosyl-phosphatidyl-myo-inositol-based glycolipids, lipomannan, and lipoarabinomannan (19, 20). To transport proteins across the cell wall, Mtb uses the 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6) protein family secretion (ESX) system, which is encoded by the esx-1 locus. ESAT-6 (EsxA) is a key virulence factor (21). Upon infection with Mtb, phagocytes, particularly macrophages, respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as TLRs, C-type lectin receptors (e.g., Dectin-1), and Fc receptors (22, 23, 24). Recognition of Mtb PAMPs by PRRs triggers an intracellular signaling cascade resulting in activation of the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. This induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines and other antimicrobial effector molecules (24).

The mechanisms by which innate immune signaling activates inflammatory and effector pathways during mycobacterial infection are reviewed elsewhere (24, 25, 26, 27). The details of the innate immune pathways subverted by virulent Mtb are beyond the scope of this review. To successfully respond to Mtb infection, it is important to minimize immune-related damage while maintaining the host's ability to mount a protective immune response.

Mtb ESCAPE FROM PHAGOLYSOSOMAL FUSION

Mtb has evolved multiple strategies to evade host immunity and overcome macrophage defenses. Mtb survives within macrophages primarily by blocking phagosomal maturation (28, 29). Mtb phagosomal vacuoles do not acquire vesicular proton-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) (30). The ESAT-6-CFP-10 secretion system is implicated in the blockade of phagolysosomal fusion, contributing to intracellular survival of Mtb (31). In addition, the function of Mtb Rv3671c, which encodes a membrane-associated protein, is related to acid resistance and virulence; it also maintains intrabacterial pH (32). Furthermore, the most abundant Mtb lipid component, trehalose 6,6′-dimycolate (TDM), inhibits phagosomal acidification and promotes virulence (33). Notably, injection of TDM emulsion into mice resulted in a similar immunopathology in the lung as that observed in mice infected with Mtb (34). By interacting with the Mincle receptor, TDM inhibits phagosome maturation, contributing to TDM-induced virulence (35). Also, Mtb-derived TDM has been shown to induce severe tissue disruption, vascular occlusion, cell damage, and inflammation (36).

Phagosomal maturation by fusion with lysosomes depends on vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase), which acidifies the phagosomal lumen by hydrolyzing ATP (37, 38). Mtb inhibits host V-ATPase via mechanisms involving the mycobacterial phosphatase PtpA (39). As a secreted protein, PtpA interacts with V-ATPase to promote Mtb survival and pathogenicity (39). PtpA promotes escape from Mycobacterium-containing vacuoles by inhibiting the recruitment of V-ATPase (40). The Mtb SecA2 accessory system is required for arrest of phagosome maturation and the intracellular growth of Mtb (41). In addition, the phosphatase SapM and the kinase PknG, which are exported by SecA2, block Mtb delivery to autophagolysosomes (42).

Host factors are required for arresting phagosome acidification during Mtb infection. Mtb-induced STAT5-mediated expression of cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CISH) promotes intracellular Mtb replication by inducing the degradation of V-ATPase catalytic subunit A (43). By contrast, disruption of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and SCAR homolog (WASH), a host actin nucleation-promoting factor, contributes to the accumulation of V-ATPase around the phagosomal vacuole by generating and associating with F-actin on the mycobacterial vacuole (44). Pathogenic mycobacteria subvert actin polymerization to escape phagosomal acidification. Cytokines are implicated in phagolysosomal acidification. For example, IL-12 exerted a positive, and IL-27 a negative, effect on phagosomal acquisition of V-ATPase and cathepsin D activity (Table 1) (45). Although arrest of phagosome maturation is a key virulence mechanism of Mtb, the effectors and their functions in vivo are unknown. Identification of the effectors that promote Mtb escape from phagolysosomal fusion will promote the development of therapeutics for TB.


Table 1
Mtb strategies for escaping phagolysosomal fusion
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

Mtb INTERACTIONS WITH HOST AUTOPHAGY

Autophagy is an intrinsic catabolic process of lysosomal degradation of damaged organelles or intracellular protein aggregates (46). There are three major types of autophagy—macro-autophagy, micro-autophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (47). Although initially regarded as a nonspecific bulk degradation process, autophagy is required for selective degradation of protein aggregates, damaged mitochondria, and intracellular pathogens (48, 49). Importantly, selective autophagy is mediated by autophagy receptors that recognize signals and bind to LC3/GABARAP proteins on the autophagosome membrane. Selective autophagy operates via ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent or -independent pathways (49, 50, 51). As an antibacterial defense, xenophagy of intracellular pathogens has been reported for Mtb and Salmonella typhimurium (2).

Mtb interactions with xenophagy

Direct contact between Mtb and the cytosol induces xenophagy, which promotes clearance of pathogens (52, 53, 54). The ESX-1 secretion system of Mtb facilitates phagosomal permeabilization, thus activating Ub-mediated, STING-dependent xenophagy and enhancing resistance to Mtb infection (53). The Ub ligases Parkin and Smurf1 are required for Ub-mediated autophagy of Mtb (54, 55). The sensing of bacterial DNA by the cytosolic DNA sensor, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (c-GAS), promotes the production of type I IFN (53), which is related to host susceptibility to chronic TB and impaired control of intracellular mycobacteria in human macrophages (56, 57). In IFN-γ-activated macrophages, the host protein ubiquilin 1 is required for xenophagy activation and intracellular Mtb control, as it promotes accumulation of Ub, p62, and LC3 around Mtb bacilli (58). Mtb Ag-induced IFN-γ responses are correlated with the autophagy level in CD14-positive cells from healthy donors and patients with TB (59).

After ubiquitination of bacterial phagosomes, autophagy adaptors including p62 and NDP52 interact with Ub and deliver Mtb phagosomes to autophagosomes through LC3-interacting regions (53, 54). In lysosomal and phagosomal damage models, TRIM16 controls ubiquitination and autophagy by recognizing endosomal/lysosomal damage and interacting with the cytosolic lectin, Galectin-3. Furthermore, TRIM16 interacts with the key autophagic core proteins ATG16L1, ULK1, and Beclin 1, and is required for the translocation of Mtb to autolysosomal compartments. Importantly, TRIM16 and Galectin-3 are required to control intracellular Mtb infection (60). Galectin-8 regulates xenophagy through interacting with mTOR complex in damaged endomembrane/lysosomal damage during Mtb infection (61).

Modulation of autophagy by Mtb

Mtb-derived effectors regulate host xenophagy, LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), and macroautophagy. The ESX-1 system, which includes ESAT-6 and EspB, intereferes with autophagy to inhibit microbial clearance from host cells (62, 63). The Mtb enhanced intracellular survival (eis) gene is involved with the regulation of autophagic cell death and redox balance, but is not directly involved in host innate immunity in vivo (64). In addition, CpsA, a LytR-CpsA-Psr domain-containing protein of Mtb, promotes evasion of host defense mechanisms involving NADPH oxidase and LAP (65). The Mtb components required for escaping from autophagy are unclear. Further studies should characterize Mtb effectors that modulate autophagy.

Host factors that regulate xenophagy

Polymorphisms of GTPase family M protein (IRGM) modulate autophagy and antimicrobial effector function (66, 67, 68, 69). IRGM interacts with core autophagy regulators including ULK1 and Beclin 1, and activates Beclin 1 to promote autophagy and host antimicrobial defense (70). Although xenophagy controls intracellular Mtb replication in vitro, its role in vivo is unclear. Mice with an Atg5 deficiency in monocyte-derived cells and neutrophils exhibited increased susceptibility to Mtb infection because of enhanced pathological inflammation (53, 71, 72). However, the lack of Smurf1, an E3 Ub ligase essential for xenophagy of Mtb, led to an increased bacterial load and accelerated mortality due to chronic Mtb infection. Therefore, autophagy may play a role in chronic infection in vivo (55). Galectin-8 is critical in the host defense against Mtb, because Galectin-8-knockout mice are susceptible to Mtb infection (61). Mechanistically, Galectin-8 is required for the activation of autophagy via the mTOR-AMP activated protein kinase pathway (61).

The C-type lectin receptor CLEC4E, which associates with TLR4, suppressed Mtb growth in mouse and guinea pig models (73). Importantly, combination therapy using agonists of both CLEC4E and TLR4 together with antibiotic treatment activated host defensive pathways at least partially through macroautophagy/autophagy (73). Mitochondrial sirtuin 3 promotes host antimycobacterial defense in macrophages and in vivo by enhancing antibacterial autophagy and controlling mitochondrial homeostasis (74). A variety of host factors modulate autophagy to enhance or inhibit the host antimicrobial response to Mtb infection (75). It is important to identify new therapeutic agents that restrict the survival of Mtb (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
Crosstalk between Mtb and xenophagy.
ESX-1 secretion system damage Mtb-contained phagosome and resist from xenophagic pathway. Parkin1 and Smurf1 ubiuitinate damaged Mtb-contained phagosome to control Mtb survival. During Mtb infection, cGAS binds Mtb DNA and then activate type I interferons through STING pathway. In addition, damaged phagosome recruits Galectin-3, resulting in Galectin-3-TRIM16-ULK1-Beclin-1-ATG16L1 complex and initiation of autophagy. Galectin-8 suppresses mTOR activity in response to lysosomal damage. In IFN-γ-activated macrophages, ubiquilin 1 promotes ubiquitin, p62, and LC3 around Mtb and IFN-γ-induced IRGM interacts with autophagy machinery such as Beclin 1, ULK1, and ATG16L1. Mtb eis gene play role in regulating of autophagy. Furthermore, CpsA, protein of Mtb, evades from LAP and inhibits LAPosome formation during Mtb infection. In mouse and guinea pigs model, agonists for both CLEC4E and TLR4 activate autophagy, thereby reducing bacterial load. Sirtuin 3, enhances autophagy through TFEB and PPARA.
Click for larger imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

MODULATION OF APOPTOSIS BY Mtb

The survival of Mtb in host cells is promoted by its interactions with the apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, and autophagy pathways (76). Apoptosis is an important mechanism by which host cells suppress intracellular replication of Mtb (77, 78). Virulent Mtb strains evade apoptosis (79, 80). Several mycobacterial effectors inhibit apoptosis by various mechanisms, thus enhancing virulence (76, 78). However, apoptosis during later stages of Mtb infection is implicated in dissemination (81).

Several Mtb proteins/Ags induce apoptosis. ESAT-6 induces apoptosis in macrophages by activating the intrinsic pathway and ROS signaling (82) and by targeting miRNA-155 and the SOCS1 pathway (83). In addition, ESAT-6, in cooperation with phthiocerol dimycocerosate, induced the rupture of phagosomal membranes and host cell apoptosis, thus contributing to virulence (84). The PGRS domain of Rv0297 (Rv0297PGRS), which is required for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization, is implicated in caspase-8-mediated apoptosis and ER stress-induced cell death (81). Wang et al. (85) reported that the Mtb Ag MPT83 (Rv2872), a secreted lipoprotein, activated apoptosis of macrophages via a mechanism involving the TLR2/p38 MAPK/cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 signaling pathway. The Mtb-derived TLR2 ligand, Rv1016c lipoprotein, induces macrophage apoptosis and inhibits MHC-II expression induced by IFN-γ, resulting in escape from immune surveillance and promoting chronic infection (86). The Mtb lipoprotein known as 38-kDa Ag induces MCP-1, which in turn induces MCP-1-induced protein and enhances the production of ROS and ER-stress-induced apoptosis (87).

Mannose-capped lipoarabinomannan inhibits host-cell apoptosis by inducing antiapoptotic B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 family member A1 (88). Interestingly, the Mtb chaperone protein Cpn60.2 suppresses apoptosis by interacting with mitochondrial mortalin, thereby enhancing intracellular Mtb survival (89). The Mtb PE/PPE family protein PE_PGRS18 promotes pathogenesis by attenuating macrophage apoptosis (90). LpqT from Mtb inhibits TLR2-dependent inflammatory signaling and apoptosis (91). Mycobacterial acyl carrier protein (Rv2244), which is involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis, inhibits macrophage apoptosis by suppressing the ROS/JNK signaling pathway, contributing to Mtb virulence (92). SP110b, an IFN-induced nuclear protein, exerts a protective effect by modulating NF-κB-mediated inflammatory signaling and ameliorating cell death and necrotic lung lesions (93). The protective effect from Ag-mediated regulation of apoptosis is context dependent (Table 2). Further studies should clarify the role of Ags in antimycobacterial immunity. There is a strong relationship between apoptosis and autophagy in various biological responses. However, the roles of mycobacterial Ag(s) in regulating apoptosis and autophagy during Mtb infection are unclear.


Table 2
Ag-mediated regulation of host cell apoptosis
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

REGULATION OF HOST CELL NECROSIS BY Mtb

The cells that are frequently observed to participate in inflammatory pathology in actively necrotic granulomas are thought to be neutrophils (94). Indeed, intra-alveolar neutrophil infiltration and an excessive inflammatory response play key roles in the progression to active TB, which is characterized by initial caseous and later liquefactive necrosis in the lung (95, 96). Neutrophil necrosis induced by Mtb contributes to Mtb growth in host cells, thus sustaining the infection (97). Interestingly, this can be ameliorated by inhibiting ROS production (97). Mtb infection renders human macrophages necrotic, favoring Mtb replication (98). Also, Mtb rapidly proliferate as a clump inside dead cells rather than in live cells (99). Mtb induces neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) that promote the recruitment and activation of effector cells (100).

Several Mtb proteins activate necrosis of host macrophages in vivo. ESAT-6 triggers intracellular Ca2+ influx, inducing neutrophil necrosis and production of NETs, ultimately contributing to necrotic pathology and TB transmission (94). Therefore, the virulence protein ESAT-6 is an important therapeutic target (101). In addition, PPE11 (Rv0453), which has been found in infected guinea pig lung, promoted mycobacterial survival under stressful conditions by enhancing inflammation, organ pathology, and host-cell death (102). Recombinant PE17 (Rv1646) inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, and TNF-α) and enhances macrophage necrosis (Table 3) (103). The degree of tissue necrosis and lung inflammation may be strain-specific—TLR2-deficient mice infected with Mtb W-Beijing exhibited increased neutrophil infiltration (104). Characterization of the functions of Mtb proteins and lipids in inducing host cell necrosis will provide insight into its virulence mechanisms (105).


Table 3
Ag-mediated regulation of host cell necrosis
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

The local expression of CXC chemokines such as CXCL5, primarily by epithelial cells, enhances the recruitment of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, promoting pulmonary inflammation and a defective host defense (106). Also, IL-17A expression by non-hematopoietic cells is involved in neutrophil infiltration during mycobacterial infection (107). Excessive pulmonary inflammatory responses, mainly induced by neutrophils, promote pathologic inflammation by increasing CXCL5 and TNF-α levels and suppressing host defenses during Mtb infection (74). The detrimental effects of type I IFN and its receptor (IFNAR1) in pulmonary TB is due in part to CXCL5/CXCL1-induced infiltration of neutrophils (108). The molecular mechanisms by which Mtb and its effectors aggravate host cell necrosis during TB are unclear. Understanding the mechanisms of induction of host cell necrosis would facilitate the development of novel therapeutic approaches (109).

CONCLUSIONS

Several Mtb effectors participate in escape from phagolysosomal acidification. Xenophagy is an important lysosomal degradation pathway that activates host antimicrobial defenses. Mtb has evolved several mechanisms to exploit autophagy. Several Mtb effectors modulate apoptosis and so influence host antimicrobial defenses in a context-dependent manner. The roles of autophagy and apoptosis in the host-Mtb interaction are unclear. Additionally, Mtb and its components induce inflammation, which is implicated in both protective immune responses and pathogenic necrosis. Neutrophils aggravate pathologic inflammation and necrosis, highlighting their involvement in the pathogenesis of TB.

Several questions remain to be addressed. What are the determinant(s) of the complexity of the interactions between Mtb and host cells? In addition, the mechanisms by which Mtb and its components inhibit autophagy and apoptosis are unclear. The in vivo functions of autophagy need to be clarified to enable the development of autophagy-targeted adjunctive therapies. Do host signaling factors orchestrate apoptosis and necrosis to promote antimicrobial defense? Also, the molecular mechanism that controls necrosis warrants further investigation. Our understanding of the immune, autophagic, and cell-death responses during TB is incomplete. Further studies will provide insight into the molecular dialogue between Mtb and host cells, and so facilitate the development of novel therapeutics for TB and other chronic intracellular infections.

Notes

Conflict of Interest:The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:

  • Validation: Silwal P.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim JK, Jo EK.

Abbreviations
ATPase adenosine triphosphatase
c-GAS cyclic GMP-AMP synthase
CISH cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein
COX cyclooxygenase
ER endoplasmic reticulum
ESAT-6 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target
ESX early secretory antigenic target protein family secretion
LAP LC3-associated phagocytosis
Mtb Mycobacterium tuberculosis
NET neutrophil extracellular trap
PAMP pathogen-associated molecular pattern
PRR pattern recognition receptor
TB tuberculosis
TDM trehalose 6,6′-dimycolate
Ub ubiquitin
V-ATPase vacuolar adenosine triphosphatase
WASH Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and SCAR homolog
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to current and past members of our laboratory for discussions and investigations that contributed to this article. This work was supported by the NRF grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2019R1I1A1A01062086). We apologize to everyone whose work and publications could not be referenced due to space limitations.

References
Liu CH, Liu H, Ge B. Innate immunity in tuberculosis: host defense vs pathogen evasion. Cell Mol Immunol 2017;14:963–975.
Queiroz A, Riley LW. Bacterial immunostat: Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipids and their role in the host immune response. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2017;50:9–18.
Cooper AM. Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol 2009;27:393–422.
Stutz MD, Clark MP, Doerflinger M, Pellegrini M. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: rewiring host cell signaling to promote infection. J Leukoc Biol 2018;103:259–268.
Poirier V, Av-Gay Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulators of the macrophage's cellular events. Microbes Infect 2012;14:1211–1219.
Brighenti S, Joosten SA. Friends and foes of tuberculosis: modulation of protective immunity. J Intern Med 2018;284:125–144.
Jiao Y, Sun J. Bacterial manipulation of autophagic responses in infection and inflammation. Front Immunol 2019;10:2821.
Deretic V, Saitoh T, Akira S. Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:722–737.
Kimmey JM, Stallings CL. Bacterial pathogens versus autophagy: implications for therapeutic interventions. Trends Mol Med 2016;22:1060–1076.
Upadhyay S, Mittal E, Philips JA. Tuberculosis and the art of macrophage manipulation. Pathog Dis 2018;76:76.
Krakauer T. Inflammasomes, autophagy, and cell death: the trinity of innate host defense against intracellular bacteria. Mediators Inflamm 2019;2019:2471215
Lam A, Prabhu R, Gross CM, Riesenberg LA, Singh V, Aggarwal S. Role of apoptosis and autophagy in tuberculosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2017;313:L218–L229.
Huang L, Nazarova EV, Tan S, Liu Y, Russell DG. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo segregates with host macrophage metabolism and ontogeny. J Exp Med 2018;215:1135–1152.
Mishra A, Surolia A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: surviving and indulging in an unwelcoming host. IUBMB Life 2018;70:917–925.
Pai M, Behr MA, Dowdy D, Dheda K, Divangahi M, Boehme CC, Ginsberg A, Swaminathan S, Spigelman M, Getahun H, et al. Tuberculosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16076.
Pagán AJ, Ramakrishnan L. The formation and function of granulomas. Annu Rev Immunol 2018;36:639–665.
Russell DG, VanderVen BC, Lee W, Abramovitch RB, Kim MJ, Homolka S, Niemann S, Rohde KH. Mycobacterium tuberculosis wears what it eats. Cell Host Microbe 2010;8:68–76.
Kaplan G, Post FA, Moreira AL, Wainwright H, Kreiswirth BN, Tanverdi M, Mathema B, Ramaswamy SV, Walther G, Steyn LM, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth at the cavity surface: a microenvironment with failed immunity. Infect Immun 2003;71:7099–7108.
Daffé M, Crick DC, Jackson M. Genetics of capsular polysaccharides and cell envelope (glyco)lipids. Microbiol Spectr 2014;2:MGM2–MGM0021.
Brennan PJ. Structure, function, and biogenesis of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2003;83:91–97.
Gröschel MI, Sayes F, Simeone R, Majlessi L, Brosch R. ESX secretion systems: mycobacterial evolution to counter host immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2016;14:677–691.
Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006;124:783–801.
Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010;11:373–384.
Basu J, Shin DM, Jo EK. Mycobacterial signaling through Toll-like receptors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012;2:145.
Schorey JS, Schlesinger LS. Innate immune responses to tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr 2016;4:4.
Shi L, Eugenin EA, Subbian S. Immunometabolism in tuberculosis. Front Immunol 2016;7:150.
Singh P, Subbian S. Harnessing the mTOR pathway for tuberculosis treatment. Front Microbiol 2018;9:70.
Hmama Z, Peña-Díaz S, Joseph S, Av-Gay Y. Immunoevasion and immunosuppression of the macrophage by Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Immunol Rev 2015;264:220–232.
Meena LS, Rajni. Survival mechanisms of pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. FEBS J 2010;277:2416–2427.
Sturgill-Koszycki S, Schlesinger PH, Chakraborty P, Haddix PL, Collins HL, Fok AK, Allen RD, Gluck SL, Heuser J, Russell DG. Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton-ATPase. Science 1994;263:678–681.
Tan T, Lee WL, Alexander DC, Grinstein S, Liu J. The ESAT-6/CFP-10 secretion system of Mycobacterium marinum modulates phagosome maturation. Cell Microbiol 2006;8:1417–1429.
Vandal OH, Pierini LM, Schnappinger D, Nathan CF, Ehrt S. A membrane protein preserves intrabacterial pH in intraphagosomal Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Nat Med 2008;14:849–854.
Kan-Sutton C, Jagannath C, Hunter RL Jr. Trehalose 6,6′-dimycolate on the surface of Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates surface marker expression for antigen presentation and costimulation in murine macrophages. Microbes Infect 2009;11:40–48.
Wei L, Wu J, Liu H, Yang H, Rong M, Li D, Zhang P, Han J, Lai R. A mycobacteriophage-derived trehalose-6,6′-dimycolate-binding peptide containing both antimycobacterial and anti-inflammatory abilities. FASEB J 2013;27:3067–3077.
Patin EC, Geffken AC, Willcocks S, Leschczyk C, Haas A, Nimmerjahn F, Lang R, Ward TH, Schaible UE. Trehalose dimycolate interferes with FcγR-mediated phagosome maturation through Mincle, SHP-1 and FcγRIIB signalling. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174973
McMullen AM, Hwang SA, O'Shea K, Aliru ML, Actor JK. Evidence for a unique species-specific hypersensitive epitope in Mycobacterium tuberculosis derived cord factor. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93 Suppl:S88–S93.
Kissing S, Saftig P, Haas A. Vacuolar ATPase in phago(lyso)some biology. Int J Med Microbiol 2018;308:58–67.
Kissing S, Hermsen C, Repnik U, Nesset CK, von Bargen K, Griffiths G, Ichihara A, Lee BS, Schwake M, De Brabander J, et al. Vacuolar ATPase in phagosome-lysosome fusion. J Biol Chem 2015;290:14166–14180.
Wong D, Bach H, Sun J, Hmama Z, Av-Gay Y. Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein tyrosine phosphatase (PtpA) excludes host vacuolar-H+-ATPase to inhibit phagosome acidification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:19371–19376.
Koliwer-Brandl H, Knobloch P, Barisch C, Welin A, Hanna N, Soldati T, Hilbi H. Distinct Mycobacterium marinum phosphatases determine pathogen vacuole phosphoinositide pattern, phagosome maturation, and escape to the cytosol. Cell Microbiol 2019;21:e13008
Sullivan JT, Young EF, McCann JR, Braunstein M. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 system subverts phagosome maturation to promote growth in macrophages. Infect Immun 2012;80:996–1006.
Zulauf KE, Sullivan JT, Braunstein M. The SecA2 pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exports effectors that work in concert to arrest phagosome and autophagosome maturation. PLoS Pathog 2018;14:e1007011
Queval CJ, Song OR, Carralot JP, Saliou JM, Bongiovanni A, Deloison G, Deboosère N, Jouny S, Iantomasi R, Delorme V, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis controls phagosomal acidification by targeting CISH-mediated signaling. Cell Reports 2017;20:3188–3198.
Kolonko M, Geffken AC, Blumer T, Hagens K, Schaible UE, Hagedorn M. WASH-driven actin polymerization is required for efficient mycobacterial phagosome maturation arrest. Cell Microbiol 2014;16:232–246.
Jung JY, Robinson CM. IL-12 and IL-27 regulate the phagolysosomal pathway in mycobacteria-infected human macrophages. Cell Commun Signal 2014;12:16.
Chun Y, Kim J. Autophagy: an essential degradation program for cellular homeostasis and life. Cells 2018;7:278.
Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008;451:1069–1075.
Kraft C, Reggiori F, Peter M. Selective types of autophagy in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793:1404–1412.
Khaminets A, Behl C, Dikic I. Ubiquitin-dependent and independent signals in selective autophagy. Trends Cell Biol 2016;26:6–16.
Cemma M, Brumell JH. Interactions of pathogenic bacteria with autophagy systems. Curr Biol 2012;22:R540–R545.
Huang J, Brumell JH. Bacteria-autophagy interplay: a battle for survival. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014;12:101–114.
Collins AC, Cai H, Li T, Franco LH, Li XD, Nair VR, Scharn CR, Stamm CE, Levine B, Chen ZJ, et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune DNA sensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Cell Host Microbe 2015;17:820–828.
Watson RO, Manzanillo PS, Cox JS. Extracellular M. tuberculosis DNA targets bacteria for autophagy by activating the host DNA-sensing pathway. Cell 2012;150:803–815.
Manzanillo PS, Ayres JS, Watson RO, Collins AC, Souza G, Rae CS, Schneider DS, Nakamura K, Shiloh MU, Cox JS. The ubiquitin ligase parkin mediates resistance to intracellular pathogens. Nature 2013;501:512–516.
Franco LH, Nair VR, Scharn CR, Xavier RJ, Torrealba JR, Shiloh MU, Levine B. The ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 functions in selective autophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and anti-tuberculous host defense. Cell Host Microbe 2017;21:59–72.
Teles RM, Graeber TG, Krutzik SR, Montoya D, Schenk M, Lee DJ, Komisopoulou E, Kelly-Scumpia K, Chun R, Iyer SS, et al. Type I interferon suppresses type II interferon-triggered human anti-mycobacterial responses. Science 2013;339:1448–1453.
Donovan ML, Schultz TE, Duke TJ, Blumenthal A. Type I interferons in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis: molecular drivers and immunological consequences. Front Immunol 2017;8:1633.
Sakowski ET, Koster S, Portal Celhay C, Park HS, Shrestha E, Hetzenecker SE, Maurer K, Cadwell K, Philips JA. Ubiquilin 1 promotes IFN-γ-induced xenophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . PLoS Pathog 2015;11:e1005076
Rovetta AI, Peña D, Hernández Del Pino RE, Recalde GM, Pellegrini J, Bigi F, Musella RM, Palmero DJ, Gutierrez M, Colombo MI, et al. IFNG-mediated immune responses enhance autophagy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in patients with active tuberculosis. Autophagy 2014;10:2109–2121.
Chauhan S, Kumar S, Jain A, Ponpuak M, Mudd MH, Kimura T, Choi SW, Peters R, Mandell M, Bruun JA, et al. Trims and Galectins globally cooperate and TRIM16 and Galectin-3 co-direct autophagy in endomembrane damage homeostasis. Dev Cell 2016;39:13–27.
Jia J, Abudu YP, Claude-Taupin A, Gu Y, Kumar S, Choi SW, Peters R, Mudd MH, Allers L, Salemi M, et al. Galectins control mTOR in response to endomembrane damage. Mol Cell 2018;70:120–135.e8.
Wong KW. The role of ESX-1 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis. Microbiol Spectr 2017;5:TBTB2-0001-2015
Behura A, Mishra A, Chugh S, Mawatwal S, Kumar A, Manna D, Mishra A, Singh R, Dhiman R. ESAT-6 modulates Calcimycin-induced autophagy through microRNA-30a in mycobacteria infected macrophages. J Infect 2019;79:139–152.
Shin DM, Jeon BY, Lee HM, Jin HS, Yuk JM, Song CH, Lee SH, Lee ZW, Cho SN, Kim JM, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis eis regulates autophagy, inflammation, and cell death through redox-dependent signaling. PLoS Pathog 2010;6:e1001230
Köster S, Upadhyay S, Chandra P, Papavinasasundaram K, Yang G, Hassan A, Grigsby SJ, Mittal E, Park HS, Jones V, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is protected from NADPH oxidase and LC3-associated phagocytosis by the LCP protein CpsA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114:E8711–E8720.
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Craddock N, Hurles ME, Cardin N, Pearson RD, Plagnol V, Robson S, Vukcevic D, Barnes C, Conrad DF, et al. Genome-wide association study of CNVs in 16,000 cases of eight common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2010;464:713–720.
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007;447:661–678.
Brest P, Lapaquette P, Souidi M, Lebrigand K, Cesaro A, Vouret-Craviari V, Mari B, Barbry P, Mosnier JF, Hébuterne X, et al. A synonymous variant in IRGM alters a binding site for miR-196 and causes deregulation of IRGM-dependent xenophagy in Crohn's disease. Nat Genet 2011;43:242–245.
McCarroll SA, Huett A, Kuballa P, Chilewski SD, Landry A, Goyette P, Zody MC, Hall JL, Brant SR, Cho JH, et al. Deletion polymorphism upstream of IRGM associated with altered IRGM expression and Crohn's disease. Nat Genet 2008;40:1107–1112.
Chauhan S, Mandell MA, Deretic V. IRGM governs the core autophagy machinery to conduct antimicrobial defense. Mol Cell 2015;58:507–521.
Kimmey JM, Huynh JP, Weiss LA, Park S, Kambal A, Debnath J, Virgin HW, Stallings CL. Unique role for ATG5 in neutrophil-mediated immunopathology during M. tuberculosis infection. Nature 2015;528:565–569.
Castillo EF, Dekonenko A, Arko-Mensah J, Mandell MA, Dupont N, Jiang S, Delgado-Vargas M, Timmins GS, Bhattacharya D, Yang H, et al. Autophagy protects against active tuberculosis by suppressing bacterial burden and inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:E3168–E3176.
Pahari S, Negi S, Aqdas M, Arnett E, Schlesinger LS, Agrewala JN. Induction of autophagy through CLEC4E in combination with TLR4: an innovative strategy to restrict the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Autophagy 2020;16:1021–1043.
Kim TS, Jin YB, Kim YS, Kim S, Kim JK, Lee HM, Suh HW, Choe JH, Kim YJ, Koo BS, et al. SIRT3 promotes antimycobacterial defenses by coordinating mitochondrial and autophagic functions. Autophagy 2019;15:1356–1375.
Bruns H, Stenger S. New insights into the interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human macrophages. Future Microbiol 2014;9:327–341.
Mohareer K, Asalla S, Banerjee S. Cell death at the cross roads of host-pathogen interaction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2018;113:99–121.
Zhai W, Wu F, Zhang Y, Fu Y, Liu Z. The immune escape mechanisms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:340.
Behar SM, Briken V. Apoptosis inhibition by intracellular bacteria and its consequence on host immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2019;60:103–110.
Keane J, Remold HG, Kornfeld H. Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages. J Immunol 2000;164:2016–2020.
Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Keane J, Kornfeld H, Remold HG. Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades apoptosis of host macrophages by release of TNF-R2, resulting in inactivation of TNF-alpha. J Immunol 1998;161:2636–2641.
Grover S, Sharma T, Singh Y, Kohli S, P M, Singh A, Semmler T, Wieler LH, Tedin K, Ehtesham NZ, et al. The PGRS domain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS protein Rv0297 is involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis through Toll-like receptor 4. MBio 2018;9:e01017-18
Lin J, Chang Q, Dai X, Liu D, Jiang Y, Dai Y. Early secreted antigenic target of 6-kDa of Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes caspase-9/caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in macrophages. Mol Cell Biochem 2019;457:179–189.
Yang S, Li F, Jia S, Zhang K, Jiang W, Shang Y, Chang K, Deng S, Chen M. Early secreted antigen ESAT-6 of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis promotes apoptosis of macrophages via targeting the microRNA155-SOCS1 interaction. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;35:1276–1288.
Augenstreich J, Arbues A, Simeone R, Haanappel E, Wegener A, Sayes F, Le Chevalier F, Chalut C, Malaga W, Guilhot C, et al. ESX-1 and phthiocerol dimycocerosates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis act in concert to cause phagosomal rupture and host cell apoptosis. Cell Microbiol 2017;19:e12726
Wang L, Zuo M, Chen H, Liu S, Wu X, Cui Z, Yang H, Liu H, Ge B. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoprotein MPT83 induces apoptosis of infected macrophages by activating the TLR2/p38/COX-2 signaling pathway. J Immunol 2017;198:4772–4780.
Su H, Zhu S, Zhu L, Huang W, Wang H, Zhang Z, Xu Y. Recombinant lipoprotein rv1016c derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a TLR-2 ligand that induces macrophages apoptosis and inhibits MHC II antigen processing. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016;6:147.
Lim YJ, Choi JA, Lee JH, Choi CH, Kim HJ, Song CH. Mycobacterium tuberculosis 38-kDa antigen induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis via toll-like receptor 2/4. Apoptosis 2015;20:358–370.
Halder P, Kumar R, Jana K, Chakraborty S, Ghosh Z, Kundu M, Basu J. Gene expression profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Lipoarabinomannan-treated macrophages: a role of the Bcl-2 family member A1 in inhibition of apoptosis in mycobacteria-infected macrophages. IUBMB Life 2015;67:726–736.
Joseph S, Yuen A, Singh V, Hmama Z. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cpn60.2 (GroEL2) blocks macrophage apoptosis via interaction with mitochondrial mortalin. Biol Open 2017;6:481–488.
Yang W, Deng W, Zeng J, Ren S, Ali MK, Gu Y, Li Y, Xie J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS18 enhances the intracellular survival of M. smegmatis via altering host macrophage cytokine profiling and attenuating the cell apoptosis. Apoptosis 2017;22:502–509.
Li F, Feng L, Jin C, Wu X, Fan L, Xiong S, Dong Y. LpqT improves mycobacteria survival in macrophages by inhibiting TLR2 mediated inflammatory cytokine expression and cell apoptosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2018;111:57–66.
Paik S, Choi S, Lee KI, Back YW, Son YJ, Jo EK, Kim HJ. Mycobacterium tuberculosis acyl carrier protein inhibits macrophage apoptotic death by modulating the reactive oxygen species/c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. Microbes Infect 2019;21:40–49.
Leu JS, Chen ML, Chang SY, Yu SL, Lin CW, Wang H, Chen WC, Chang CH, Wang JY, Lee LN, et al. Sp110b controls host immunity and susceptibility to tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:369–382.
Francis RJ, Butler RE, Stewart GR. Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 is a leukocidin causing Ca2+ influx, necrosis and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cell Death Dis 2014;5:e1474
Niazi MK, Dhulekar N, Schmidt D, Major S, Cooper R, Abeijon C, Gatti DM, Kramnik I, Yener B, Gurcan M, et al. Lung necrosis and neutrophils reflect common pathways of susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in genetically diverse, immune-competent mice. Dis Model Mech 2015;8:1141–1153.
Marzo E, Vilaplana C, Tapia G, Diaz J, Garcia V, Cardona PJ. Damaging role of neutrophilic infiltration in a mouse model of progressive tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2014;94:55–64.
Dallenga T, Repnik U, Corleis B, Eich J, Reimer R, Griffiths GW, Schaible UE. M. tuberculosis-induced necrosis of infected neutrophils promotes bacterial growth following phagocytosis by macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 2017;22:519–530.e3.
Lerner TR, Borel S, Greenwood DJ, Repnik U, Russell MR, Herbst S, Jones ML, Collinson LM, Griffiths G, Gutierrez MG. Mycobacterium tuberculosis replicates within necrotic human macrophages. J Cell Biol 2017;216:583–594.
Mahamed D, Boulle M, Ganga Y, Mc Arthur C, Skroch S, Oom L, Catinas O, Pillay K, Naicker M, Rampersad S, et al. Correction: intracellular growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after macrophage cell death leads to serial killing of host cells. eLife 2017;6:e28205
Filio-Rodríguez G, Estrada-García I, Arce-Paredes P, Moreno-Altamirano MM, Islas-Trujillo S, Ponce-Regalado MD, Rojas-Espinosa O. In vivo induction of neutrophil extracellular traps by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a guinea pig model. Innate Immun 2017;23:625–637.
Rybniker J, Chen JM, Sala C, Hartkoorn RC, Vocat A, Benjak A, Boy-Röttger S, Zhang M, Székely R, Greff Z, et al. Anticytolytic screen identifies inhibitors of mycobacterial virulence protein secretion. Cell Host Microbe 2014;16:538–548.
Peng X, Luo T, Zhai X, Zhang C, Suo J, Ma P, Wang C, Bao L. PPE11 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can alter host inflammatory response and trigger cell death. Microb Pathog 2019;126:45–55.
Li Z, Liu H, Li H, Dang G, Cui Z, Song N, Wang Q, Liu S, Chen L. PE17 protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis enhances Mycobacterium smegmatis survival in macrophages and pathogenicity in mice. Microb Pathog 2019;126:63–73.
Gopalakrishnan A, Dietzold J, Verma S, Bhagavathula M, Salgame P. Toll-like receptor 2 prevents neutrophil-driven immunopathology during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis by curtailing CXCL5 production. Infect Immun 2019;87:e00760-18
Simeone R, Bottai D, Frigui W, Majlessi L, Brosch R. ESX/type VII secretion systems of mycobacteria: insights into evolution, pathogenicity and protection. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015;95 Suppl 1:S150–S154.
Nouailles G, Dorhoi A, Koch M, Zerrahn J, Weiner J 3rd, Faé KC, Arrey F, Kuhlmann S, Bandermann S, Loewe D, et al. CXCL5-secreting pulmonary epithelial cells drive destructive neutrophilic inflammation in tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 2014;124:1268–1282.
Lombard R, Doz E, Carreras F, Epardaud M, Le Vern Y, Buzoni-Gatel D, Winter N. IL-17RA in non-hematopoietic cells controls CXCL-1 and 5 critical to recruit neutrophils to the lung of mycobacteria-infected mice during the adaptive immune response. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149455
Dorhoi A, Yeremeev V, Nouailles G, Weiner J 3rd, Jörg S, Heinemann E, Oberbeck-Müller D, Knaul JK, Vogelzang A, Reece ST, et al. Type I IFN signaling triggers immunopathology in tuberculosis-susceptible mice by modulating lung phagocyte dynamics. Eur J Immunol 2014;44:2380–2393.
Pagán AJ, Ramakrishnan L. Immunity and immunopathology in the tuberculous granuloma. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014;5:a018499